================
@@ -51,14 +51,15 @@ DefaultTemplateArgumentContainsUnexpandedPack(const
TemplateParam &P) {
P.getDefaultArgument().getArgument().containsUnexpandedParameterPack();
}
-TemplateParameterList::TemplateParameterList(const ASTContext& C,
+TemplateParameterList::TemplateParameterList(const ASTContext &C,
SourceLocation TemplateLoc,
SourceLocation LAngleLoc,
ArrayRef<NamedDecl *> Params,
SourceLocation RAngleLoc,
Expr *RequiresClause)
- : TemplateLoc(TemplateLoc), LAngleLoc(LAngleLoc), RAngleLoc(RAngleLoc),
- NumParams(Params.size()), ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack(false),
+ : InjectedArgs(&C), TemplateLoc(TemplateLoc), LAngleLoc(LAngleLoc),
----------------
sdkrystian wrote:
> I also think that there is some level of awkwardness to doing an allocation
> in a function whose type doesn't really look like it should be able to
> allocate.
Since it's an accessor for lazily allocated data, it has to allocate if the
data hasn't been allocated yet :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113579
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
