================
@@ -51,14 +51,15 @@ DefaultTemplateArgumentContainsUnexpandedPack(const
TemplateParam &P) {
P.getDefaultArgument().getArgument().containsUnexpandedParameterPack();
}
-TemplateParameterList::TemplateParameterList(const ASTContext& C,
+TemplateParameterList::TemplateParameterList(const ASTContext &C,
SourceLocation TemplateLoc,
SourceLocation LAngleLoc,
ArrayRef<NamedDecl *> Params,
SourceLocation RAngleLoc,
Expr *RequiresClause)
- : TemplateLoc(TemplateLoc), LAngleLoc(LAngleLoc), RAngleLoc(RAngleLoc),
- NumParams(Params.size()), ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack(false),
+ : InjectedArgs(&C), TemplateLoc(TemplateLoc), LAngleLoc(LAngleLoc),
----------------
sdkrystian wrote:
> This trickery with storing the ASTContext seems a little silly.
@erichkeane Is there any particular reason why? We already do something similar
in e.g. `Redeclarable::DeclLink`. The injected template arguments are lazily
allocated & cached, so we don't need the pointer to `ASTContext` once the
injected template arguments have been allocated. Since we _can_ use a
`PointerUnion` to store both values, I think adding yet another pointer to
`TemplateParameterList` would be rather unjustified.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113579
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
