================
@@ -51,14 +51,15 @@ DefaultTemplateArgumentContainsUnexpandedPack(const
TemplateParam &P) {
P.getDefaultArgument().getArgument().containsUnexpandedParameterPack();
}
-TemplateParameterList::TemplateParameterList(const ASTContext& C,
+TemplateParameterList::TemplateParameterList(const ASTContext &C,
SourceLocation TemplateLoc,
SourceLocation LAngleLoc,
ArrayRef<NamedDecl *> Params,
SourceLocation RAngleLoc,
Expr *RequiresClause)
- : TemplateLoc(TemplateLoc), LAngleLoc(LAngleLoc), RAngleLoc(RAngleLoc),
- NumParams(Params.size()), ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack(false),
+ : InjectedArgs(&C), TemplateLoc(TemplateLoc), LAngleLoc(LAngleLoc),
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Honestly, I strongly dislike it there as well. It seems like quite a hacky way
of getting our intended behavior here that is jarring/unreadable every time I
see it. I also think that there is some level of awkwardness to doing an
allocation in a function whose type doesn't really look like it should be able
to allocate.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113579
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
