mstorsjo wrote: > For the Mips backend itself, I would ask the Mips backend code maintainer... > but we don't have a maintainer for Mips. And we don't have any buildbots. I'm > really not sure about adding complexity to a backend which is already > suffering from a lack of anyone that has any experience with it. (People > familiar with other backends can sort of step in to review changes to Mips, > but it's hard to do a good review for anything non-trivial.)
FWIW, I've seen @wzssyqa do some amount of work around MIPS, should we ask them about whether want to take up the role as MIPS backend maintainer? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107744 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
