rnk added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047#629889, @chandlerc wrote:
> I only have a mild preference for how we spell the name based on the fact > that i've told people to use -disable-llvm-optzns for years. If we want to go > with ...-passes, fine with me. We have some freedom to change the -cc1 interface. I liked being able to pass -g to -cc1, but then we went to -debug-info-kind=(limited|full|linetables) or whatever. =? > I'll probably just add an alias so that you can use either spelling, but > change the tests to consolidate on whichever spelling we end up with. > > SG? I can regenerate the patch if desired, but it'll just be a lot of perl... Sounds good! We definitely don't need both -disable-llvm-optzns and -disable-llvm-passes. https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
