mehdi_amini added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047#629746, @rnk wrote:
> How about standardizing on -disable-llvm-passes instead of > -disable-llvm-optzns? I never liked "optzns" and can't remember how to spell > it. Also, this flag disables LLVM instrumentation passes (ASan) as well as > optimization passes, so I think -disable-llvm-passes is the better name. I agree with that. To be friendly with developers/users we could print an error mentioning to use `-disable-llvm-passes` when they try to use `-disable-llvm-optzns` (which we accept as a `-mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns` hardcoded in the driver by the way). https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
