shafik added a comment. In D156247#4536034 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247#4536034>, @tahonermann wrote:
>> You are absolutely right, -fno-coroutines would totally work for us, had it >> been available. > > Good. Gcc handles `-fcoroutines` and `-fno-coroutines` as I would expect > (https://godbolt.org/z/7zEMd7cdW), so matching gcc behavior makes sense in > any case. I would expect implementation to be quite straight forward, so I > recommend we head in that direction. This feels like a much cleaner solution to me as well. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
