ilya-biryukov added a comment. In D156247#4535664 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247#4535664>, @tahonermann wrote:
> At first, it sounded to me like the option that would best suit Google's > needs is `-fno-coroutines`. However: > > - I see that Google does have some limited use of coroutines; perhaps that > could be enabled on a per-TU or project basis by the build system? However... > - The `-fno-coroutines` option doesn't seem to work; > https://godbolt.org/z/Phhqjd9so (Nor does `-fcoroutines` work to enable > standard library coroutine features in pre-C++20 language modes). You are absolutely right, `-fno-coroutines` would totally work for us, had it been available. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
