ChuanqiXu added a comment. > however, if there are important unresolved issues, why did we set > __cpp_impl_coroutine ?
The discussion is here: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-could-we-mark-coroutines-as-unreleased-now/69220. My short summary may be: (1) It is not necessary to claim a feature is completed only after there is no related open issues. For example, GCC claims coroutines (and many other features) as completed in the early stage and there are still many following bug reports then. (2) Coroutines are used widely and deeply around the C++ world. People from Meta (Meta should be, at least, one of the most heavy user of coroutines in the past years) said they would love to approve to the idea even if it is not bug free. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
