philnik added a comment. In D156247#4538626 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247#4538626>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> I would like explicit buy-in from the libc++ folks on the idea of adding > `-fno-coroutines` as they're going to be impacted by Clang supporting such an > option (and they may have additional testing requirements to ensure that > libc++ works reasonably well when coroutines are disabled). I don't think we want to support having another flag for a dialect, since that will result in more problems down the road. We already have a problem with the number of configurations we support and adding style-guide configurations won't help that. IMO this should just be a clang-tidy check. They can be enforced just as well as compiler warnings/errors, and don't cause problems for other people. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156247 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
