On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 21:14 +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Yes, I am still listening to this thread ;)
Thanks !
> 2010/1/3 Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com>:
> > Those are the original patches I've sent. (as remark, those patches
> > are just changing pep.em, but the same patch for it has to be added to
> > pe.em, too). Likewise the change to pe.sc should be done like pep.sc
> > one.)
Porting your pep.em work to pe.em was part of my 2009-12-06 commit.
I also committed your pep.em and pe.sc changes to our tree so we'd have
it all, and this causes Pedros confusion. (I committed this together.)
> Ah, one point I missed here to describe, why I didn't changed
> pe.em/pe.sc here. The reason is, that by using pseudo-relocation
> version 1, the IAT table possibly is corrupt. So I omitted it for
> pe.sc/pe.em. For x64 there is only pseudo-relocation version 2, so
> there is no problem to add this feature here. To enable it for x86,
> too, the code would need to check, which pseudo-relocation version is
> used and omit feature for version one.
Do you have more info on when things might go wrong ?
Pedro, beware that one of my other commits changes the default for
pseudo-relocation to v2.
Setting that back to v1 is at the top of my todo-list.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
