On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 13:08 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
> About your binutils modifications, are they commited ?If I get cegcc
> sources will I be able
> to reproduce what you are experimenting ?

Public reply because others may want to know this too.

Everything is in SVN except a one line change to fiddle with ImageBase,
see below. That shouldn't do any harm though...

        Danny

pavilion: {481} pwd
/home/danny/src/cegcc/svn.sf.net/cegcc/trunk/cegcc/src/binutils
pavilion: {482} svn diff
Index: ld/emultempl/pe.em
===================================================================
--- ld/emultempl/pe.em  (revision 1418)
+++ ld/emultempl/pe.em  (working copy)
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@
 /* Windows CE ignores the image base, but we want to
    be compatible with MSFT's tools.  */
 #undef NT_DLL_IMAGE_BASE
-#define NT_DLL_IMAGE_BASE              0x00010000
+// #define NT_DLL_IMAGE_BASE           0x00010000
+#define NT_DLL_IMAGE_BASE              0x01000000
 #endif
 
 #define U(S) ${INITIAL_SYMBOL_CHAR} S
pavilion: {483} 
-- 
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to