On Saturday 02 January 2010 16:42:23, Danny Backx wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 16:24 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > FYI, I hadn't applied the ld patch myself because I was
> > looking to confirm/hear if there's another cleaner way
> > to get at the image base, but I can't find one.  Anyway, I've
> > now commited the mingw/pseudo-reloc patch.  (A bit cleaned up from
> > yesterday's, reducing divergence from upstream mingw).
> 
> Looks like I committed only part, apologies.

Sounds like the message came across with phase inverted.

> I did some more testing and saw strange things that I need to look into
> further. libexpat still works on the emulator but not on my real device.
> It did so before.

Boo.

> Question : how certain are we that pseudo-relocation v2 is a requirement
> for all this ? I've seen improvements when doing the section move
> operations (no more separate .bss, .idata, .edata) but I've never
> actually seen a difference between v1 and v2, I took comments about that
> for granted.

It can only possibly make a difference if pseudo-relocs are
actually used.  Are you clear on what pseudo-relocs are?  I haven't
actually tested anything that generates a pseudo-reloc (v1 or v2)
on WM6.1 yet.  That being said, I don't know what Kai's patch
actually does --- it is perhaps related to stopping ld from making
sections with pseudo-relocs (.text, .rdata) writable?  That may
be required.

I tried to look at the binutils patches that you've applied
to svn, but they're all kind of mixed up.  Would it be
possible to split them up?  I guess that's what you're
trying to do?  I can't distinguish what's Kai's changes
from your WM6.1 related changes.  I thought of starting with
only the base relocation (__text_start__) patch against a
pristine upstream binutils, and work up what is really
needed for WM6.1 --- we may find out that not much else
is required, but gave up when I couldn't quickly distinguish
what is what.

-- 
Pedro Alves

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to