> On Feb 3, 2025, at 4:08 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > On 2/3/25 12:51, Wayne S via cctalk wrote: >> If safety is of paramount importance, a supplied object or executable should >> never be used. That’s just common sense. >> >> Sent from my iPhone > > Seems to be a cognitive disconnect, here. There is something there, though. If you use a binary supplied by a packager you have to worry not just about the bugs in the original open source project, but also about bugs added by patches created by the packager. There is a notorious example of one of the Linux distributions (Debian?) inserting a fatal security bug into openSSL. The original was right, but someone made a patch that clearly demonstrated an utter lack of clue. paul
- [cctalk] Open source a panacea? Donald Whittemore via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panac... Will Cooke via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a p... William Donzelli via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Tony Jones via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panac... Donald Whittemore via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a p... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open sourc... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open s... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Op... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Op... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Op... David Wade via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Op... Liam Proven via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Op... Adrian Godwin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Op... Christian Corti via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a p... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a p... Tony Jones via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open sourc... Donald Whittemore via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open s... Wayne S via cctalk