On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:43 PM Paul Koning via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Open source, properly defined, means not just that you can see the code but > that you have the possibility of building it. If DeepSeek is advertised as > open source but you can't create your own executable, that's clearly false > advertising. If you can't afford enough RAM/disk/CPUs to create and run it, that doesn't mean "not Open Source". Likewise with access to sufficient volume of training data in the case of an LLM.
- [cctalk] Re: Open... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open... ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open... David Wade via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a pan... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a pan... Tony Jones via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a... Donald Whittemore via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open sou... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open... Alexander Schreiber via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open sou... Tony Jones via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open... Scott Baker via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Alexander Schreiber via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea... Alexander Schreiber via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a pan... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a pan... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a... Alexander Schreiber via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open sou... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Tony Jones via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Wayne S via cctalk