Well, I have proof IBM used the Field Engineer term. See the punch card used to report an Incident.
https://www.ibmjunkman.com/cards/?Holder=774&Img=1
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 1403 Paul Berger via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 1403 Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 1403 Van Snyder via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... jim stephens via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 1403 Rod Bartlett via cctalk
- [cctalk] Multics on Intel, was R... Van Snyder via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Multics on Intel, w... jim stephens via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Multics on Intel, w... Mark Linimon via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Multics on Intel, w... Johan Helsingius via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Multics on Intel, w... Ken Seefried via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... Donald Whittemore via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... Paul Berger via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... Van Snyder via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... Nigel Johnson Ham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... CAREY SCHUG via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Print chain for 140... Paul Berger via cctalk
- [cctalk] 2540 [was: Print chain for 1403] CAREY SCHUG via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: 2540 [was: Print chain for ... jim stephens via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: 2540 [was: Print chain ... Jon Elson via cctalk
