On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:09 PM Sellam Abraham via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > I submit that the //gs isn't even really an Apple ][ properly. > It's more like a quasi-Macintosh with really good (not perfect) built-in > emulation of an Enhanced //e.
That totally makes sense. I never got into the //gs and that kind of frames it: I'd rather just use a //e (which is still late for me) or a ][+ but that's because I first used them back in the Integer BASIC days (and watched friends do the DOS 3.2->3.3 conversion) then used them heavily in 1984. It's just where my experience falls. -ethan > Sellam
