> On 22 Feb 2022, at 14:01, Antonio Carlini via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> On 22/02/2022 03:27, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
>> Are RX50 drives less robust than what was used to install Windoze 95?
> 
> 
> I never installed it this way myself, but MicroVMS on the MicroVAX II was 
> distributed on RX50 floppies: lost of them.
> 
> 
> Of course, that was then and the floppy drives were younger and less 
> temperamental (and perhaps the same could be said about the people feeding 
> the drives floppies ...)
> 

That didn't stop me being massively nervy installing a VMS v5.0 upgrade from 
RX50s to a customer's VAX 11/50... I think it was the first one that I'd done 
so no pressure.

-- 
Adrian Graham
Owner of Binary Dinosaurs, the UK's biggest private home computer collection?
t: @binarydinosaurs    f: facebook.com/binarydinosaurs
w: www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk





Reply via email to