Back at a more general level. To my way of thinking what Bob Supnik did
in software can be extended by producing a hardware replica vehicle for
his code to give the illusion that the original system has been
recreated. A sort of machine Turing test if you will.
Rod Smallwood
/
/
/On 14/07/2015 19:26, Chuck Guzis wrote://
/
On 07/14/2015 10:55 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
I guess I don't know the 6600 that well (I have the book, and have
skimmed it
in the past). What are the novel features in the 6600 that were widely
adopted by other machines? (I listed the Atlas because of paging, and
the 801
because of RISC.)
There are more than a few folks who call the CDC 6000 one of the first
RISC machines. In particular, the 6600 with its instruction
scheduling and reservation control, multiple functional units,
instruction cache, etc. was quite noteworthy. You could easily
recognize the earmarks of a very different machine of the time. The
issues that arose when programming later RISC CPUs made me feel that I
was back in familiar territory.
3-address architecture, 60 bit ones complement words, with separate
sets of registers for addresses and indexing.
A typical beginning programmer's problem was to write a CPU loop to
move non-overlapping fields of words in the shortest amount of time
(ECS not available). The best solution usually involved two words per
iteration, with one instruction issue per cycle; bottom of the loop
load (to overlap the branch) and top-of-the-loop store.
Another challenge was to write a routine that could load and store the
values of all registers from and to memory. Not as simple as it sounds.
For me, one distinguishing feature is that there is no condition code
register. You could branch on a register value being signed or zero,
or compare and branch on the values of two index registers. Thus, the
result of an operation was covered by the regular register reservation
rules.
The I/O processors (PPUs) had access to all of CPU memory and
essentially were their own world, using a 12-bit instruction set
derived from the 160A. One could also say that the PPUs were only one
machine with memory and registers being time-multiplexed to simulate
10 machines.
--Chuck
