Hello Derek,

You might receive more answers if you post cryoEM questions to the CCPEM list: 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=ccpem


Not sure why you need to refine a B-factor, at this resolution it won't tell 
you much, even with only one per chain or per tetramer.

For the rigid-body fit, I suggest following one of the approaches I mentioned 
in this other discussion: 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa-jisc.exe?A2=CCP4BB;f355f637.2411

You can subsequently run phenix.real_space_refine with coordinate refinement 
turned off and B-factor refinement turned on: you will get one B-factor per 
atom, but then you could take the chain- or tetramer-average as your final 
value?


Regarding which map to refine against: phenix and servalcat both accept or even 
require half-maps as input, so you mostly don't get to choose. Half-maps are 
always assumed to be un-filtered/un-sharpened (which is how they are when taken 
fresh out of your cryoEM 3D refinement job, at least in RELION and CryoSPARC).
Whether using a sharpened map is justified for coordinate refinement (if your 
model refinement program of choice accepts a single map) is worth asking and 
discussing. But for B-factor refinement you need the "raw" map, because with 
enough sharpening you could drive atomic B-factors to any arbitrarily low 
value, and in this case they would no longer describe the experimental 
uncertainty (and I don't know what else one would need atomic B-factors for).


I hope this helps,


Guillaume

________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of Derek Logan 
<0000ac2332bb2871-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:39:34 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Cryo-EM rigid body with 1 ADP per chain

Hi everyone,

I would like to do a quick rigid-body refinement of a model against a low 
resolution (6 Å) cryo-EM map. The model consists of four tetramers and I want 
to refine each tetramer as a rigid body, either with one (anisotropic?) ADP per 
tetramer or at the most one per chain. I haven't yet found a good way to do 
this. With phenix.refine the default is one ADP per residue and I can't see how 
to change that behaviour (at least through the Phenix GUI). I tried Servalcat 
but I can't see a way to restrict it to rigid body only. Given more time, I 
hope to reach a fuller understanding of each program, but I need to solve the 
immediate problem in the next couple of days (what with Christmas coming up...) 
Any suggestions?

I have also understood that the best practice is to refine against the 
unsharpened map, correct?

Thanks
Derek
_____________________________________________________
Derek Logan
Professor | Biochemistry and Structural Biology
Centre for Molecular Protein Science
Lund University, Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
www.cmps.lu.se













________________________________

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


VARNING: Klicka inte på länkar och öppna inte bilagor om du inte känner igen 
avsändaren och vet att innehållet är säkert.
CAUTION: Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognise the 
sender and know the content is safe.









När du har kontakt med oss på Uppsala universitet med e-post så innebär det att 
vi behandlar dina personuppgifter. För att läsa mer om hur vi gör det kan du 
läsa här: http://www.uu.se/om-uu/dataskydd-personuppgifter/

E-mailing Uppsala University means that we will process your personal data. For 
more information on how this is performed, please read here: 
http://www.uu.se/en/about-uu/data-protection-policy

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to