What the DeepMind people say about this is that when part of a predicted 
structure has a low predicted lDDT (a CASP measure of model quality), this is a 
good indicator that it may be intrinsically disordered. 

Best wishes,

Randy Read

> On 17 Aug 2021, at 17:13, Sorin Draga <sor.dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear all, 
> 
> Regarding the AlphaFold2: while its results are impressive for properly 
> folded proteins, I would caution against using it for IDPs: they do not have 
> a stable 3D structure that can be predicted,  instead they occupy an ensemble 
> of structures, with a high degree of heterogeneity. While you will find 
> models of IDPs predicted by AlphaFold, they only represent (at best) one of 
> many local minima that these proteins occupy.
> 
> Again, many thanks for all your excellent contributions! 
> 
> Kind regards, 
> 
> Sorin 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:59 AM George Sheldrick <gshe...@uni-goettingen.de> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> As Joel has suggested before, alphafold on an IDP would be interesting and 
> would seem like a zero-cost starting point - perhaps one you have tried 
> already.
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from ProtonMail mobile
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> On 15 Aug 2021, 15:53, Scott Horowitz < scott.horow...@du.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sorin,
> 
> I hate to say it, but this is a really tough and expensive one. Solving a 
> true conformational ensemble of one IDP of decent size (~>70 residues) at 
> something like decent resolution is hard, and not that many labs actually do 
> it (it's usually a different set of NMR techniques than solving folding 
> proteins, and that knowledge is even somewhat specialized even within the NMR 
> community). Solving a co-structural ensemble of two IDPs that bind is even 
> harder, and I'm hard pressed to remember a single case right now where it's 
> been done (probably has, but very rarely). Assuming they express really well 
> and produce decent spectra, it is in theory doable, but I'd assume multiple 
> years of work by a very good student or postdoc from a lab that specializes 
> in this and many thousands of dollars (I'd very roughly assume ~$10k in 
> materials costs alone) would be required for that co-structure.
> 
> The SAXS route is certainly less expensive and faster if it works and gets 
> you the info you need, but it certainly will be low-res. I'm not as familiar 
> with it, but if you can differentially label the proteins, the neutron 
> equivalent of SAXS might also help with the co-structural ensemble to 
> differentiate which protein is where in the resulting blob.
> 
> Scott
> 
> Scott Horowitz, Ph.D.
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry
> Knoebel Institute for Healthy Aging
> University of Denver
>  
> ECS Building
> 2155 E. Wesley Ave
> Denver, CO 80208
> Phone: 303-871-4326
> Fax: 303-871-7915
> Zoom Room: https://udenver.zoom.us/my/scotthorowitz
> Email: scott.horow...@du.edu
> Office: Room 561   Lab: Room 505
> 
> From: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on behalf of Roopa Thapar 
> <0000070a21fba45f-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
> Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2021 8:20 AM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ccp4bb] biomolecular NMR for IDPs
>  
> [External Email From]: owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk
> 
> 
> Hello Sorin,
> 
> 
> 1. The cost of getting NMR data on the IDPs you propose depends upon the 
> expression levels of the protein/s as you will need to label with 15N and 13C 
> - and depending upon your overall yields per liter of E.coli culture, this 
> can add up.  In addition you will need to run triple resonance experiments - 
> so you should look into the hourly charge to access the NMR spectrometers 
> where you are located.  Moreover, you need to account for time required for 
> optimization of solution conditions to collect the NMR data as the sample 
> needs to be homogenous (as in no aggregation) at millimolar or hundreds of 
> micromolar concentration.   As Ethan Merritt suggested, it would be a good 
> idea to use SAXS first as it requires very little sample, no isotope 
> labeling, and you can try to narrow down the solution conditions that would 
> be best suited for NMR.  The Kratky plots, Rg values under different solution 
> conditions can give very useful information about conformational states and 
> ensembles populated by IDPs.  However, although NMR tends to be more 
> expensive than other techniques but is perfect for IDPs as you point out you 
> can get residue specific information.  A combined NMR/SAXS approach has 
> proven to be very useful to validate computational models.
> 
> 2. In general, CROs are much more expensive particularly for generating 
> isotopically labeled samples - it is cost-prohibitive for academic labs.  
> Genscript is one CRO that will express proteins, but I am not sure if they 
> will make isotopically labeled proteins for NMR.
> 
> 3. The amount of protein needed depends upon the size of the molecule.  You 
> will need at least 2-3 samples that are differentially labeled with 15N, 13C 
> (also since you want data on the free and bound forms of the complex) at 0.5 
> - 1 mM depending upon the size of the molecule which relates to the 
> complexity of the NMR spectrum due to number of resonances and the relaxation 
> times.  The total volume required for each sample is between 280 ul - 600 ul, 
> depending upon which type of instrumentation and NMR probes you have access 
> to.
> 
> Hope this helps!
> 
> Best regards,
> Roopa
> 
> On Saturday, August 14, 2021, 04:12:58 PM CDT, Sorin Draga 
> <sor.dr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello everyone, 
> 
> I do realize that this is not a NMR focused group, but I do hope that there 
> are a few spectroscopists lurking around that could possibly answer a few 
> questions (I am more of a modeler/computationalist):
> 
> The problem: I have two intrinsically disordered proteins that are known to 
> interact (let's call them 1 and 2). I would like to get structural 
> information (a conformational ensemble) for 1 and for the "complex" (1+2). 
> Further down the line (depending on whether this is possible) I would also 
> like to evaluate potential small molecule inhibitors for the said complex. 
> Both 1 and 2 are <200 aminoacids long. 
> 
> The questions:
> 
> 1. Could the cost of determining the "structure" for 1 and 1+2 be estimated? 
> To be more precise, I am looking for a ball-park figure on how much a NMR 
> measurement would cost in this case.
> 2. Could anyone recommend a good group/CRO that could provide such a service 
> and not have an astronomical cost?
> 3. Any other suggestions/thoughts that you think might be worth mentioning 
> (minimum quantity of protein necessary, purity, type of NMR etc)
> 
> Many thanks for your help and time!
> 
> Cheers! 
> 
> Sorin
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
> 

-----
Randy J. Read
Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research     Tel: +44 1223 336500
The Keith Peters Building                               Fax: +44 1223 336827
Hills Road                                                       E-mail: 
rj...@cam.ac.uk
Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.                              
www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/CCP4BB, a mailing list 
hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at 
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/

Reply via email to