Well - I would stick in waters - they can be very well rdered in certain
environments.
Anecote: We have spent ages trying to put some interesting compound into a
"feature" in maps,
untill the crystals finally diffracted to 1.6A and in that map it is very
clear there are 4 beautifully shaped waters, with lots of hydrogen bonds to
the surrounding amino acides..

So all that intelligent interpretation was unnecessary!
Eleanor


On 3 November 2017 at 21:02, Abhishek Anan <rendezvous.a...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> My apology for the confusion!! I did mean the map radius is "truncated" at
> 5A. Poor choice of words :(
>
> Any thoughts on what this density could be are still welcome.
>
> Best regards,
> Abhishek
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Joern Krausze <
> j.krau...@tu-braunschweig.de> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I think Abhishek means that the picture shows 5 A map radius.
>>
>> Best
>> Joern
>>
>> On 3. Nov 2017, at 18:42, Pavel Afonine <pafon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If by "it was truncated at 5A for clarity" you really mean you truncated
>> all low-resolution data from 5A and lower then I am not surprised you see
>> funny densities all over or don't see density where it is expected. Why?
>> Consult a textbook for the answer.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Pavel
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Abhishek Anan <rendezvous.a...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Prof Schreuder
>>>
>>> Here are another couple of perspectives from coot. The density is too
>>> far and isolated from the peptide chain to be an alternate conformation or
>>> conformational change. The density of the peptide chain does not look good
>>> because it was truncated at 5A for clarity.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Abhishek
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:33 AM, <herman.schreu...@sanofi.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Abhishek,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To me, it looks like an alternative conformation of the peptide chain
>>>> or maybe even a conformational change with respect to the starting model.
>>>> The peptide chain does not look too well defined, despite high resolution
>>>> electron density.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Herman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *Im Auftrag
>>>> von *Abhishek Anan
>>>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 3. November 2017 09:26
>>>> *An:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>>>> *Betreff:* [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] another unknown density problem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have an "unknown" density in the map. I have tried to fit it to PEG
>>>> but it doesn't fit very well. I was wondering if there are other
>>>> PEG-related or other molecules I could try.
>>>>
>>>> The crystal grew in TRIS-HCl and PEG MME 2K.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>> Abhishek
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to