Do you have a loop? Multiple CE's by itself doesn't always necessitate the additional protection. Multi-homed CEs adds to that. CE's with their own "backdoor" links not through MPLS adds to that. Just look at the topology and determine from there. HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 http://www.ipexpert.com _____ From: Marut [EMAIL PROTECTED]@DCTH-BKK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 2:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: Loop protection in multi CE to PE Hi Group, Do we need to configure loop protection for Multi CE with PE routing? For Eigrp & BGP -> Do we need to config SOO even not state in the task? For ospf -> I know that we have some bit that protect loop. Right? For rip --> ????? ( A distribute-list in PE to CE ? ) Please kindly let me know your thought. Thanks, Marut **************************************************************************** This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: http://www.datacraft-asia.com/disclaimer ****************************************************************************
