Try it... It's such a common problem we even have it in many of our workbooks.
Link state updates are not multicast. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:10 AM, HEMANTH RAJ <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marko , > > hmm i don't see my databases synchronized if i have one side as BCAST and > other side as point to point. > how will DR accept on 224.0.0.5 if he thinks others are DRother > how will the DB are synced ? > could u explain me a bit more ? > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Venkee <[email protected]> wrote: >> > In this case, from one end (BCAST), would see the type-2 lsa in database >> > but >> > not on router where we have p-t-p, he might have said this >> >> That is correct. However, if you look at the adjacency between the two >> routers, it would appear as perfectly valid and the databases will be >> in sync. >> >> Another difference you will see in the database is the type of link in >> Type-1 LSA that will be Point-to-point/Stub on the p2p side and >> Transit on the broadcast side. This discrepancy is the one routers >> will use to identify the problem and cause them not to "trust" each >> other. >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert > > > > > -- > Problems arise because we talk,problems are not solved because we don't talk > So good or bad talk to your affectionate one's freely. > > Yours Friendly, > H P HEMANTH RAJ > CCIE#28593 (R&S) > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
