Hi, I dont see you getting this to work with the current configuration. Both sides assumes a behavior of the peer which is not valid.
The only reason they get to a FULL state is because the parameters to become FULL have been met (especially timers). So dont expect you routing information exchange on this adjacency. Kim On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Elie Raad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I am facing this kind of problem twice. > > OSPF over frame relay : > > The hub is running in network BROADCAST and the spokes in point-to-point. > I hard configured the hub to be the DR with priority of 255 and the spokes > with prio 0. > > Symptom: > > the neighbor relationship is FULL but routing information is not exchanged to > the hub. > > My thought: > Even if the neighbors are FULL , from the spoke perspective it assume that > no updates needs to be send to a DR since there is no DR. and from the hub > perspective , it assume that it will receive updates from the spokes since he > is the DR . > > Any Hint may be appreciated. > Thank you all! > > Elie > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs -- // Freedom Matters // CCIE #29189 // www.packet-forwarding.net _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
