Ah, ok. You had lab 9 in the Subject heading :) Looks like the addresses need to be added to the initial configs. Is there any other discrepancies you have seen?
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Eric Stanfield <[email protected]>wrote: > Workbook v10 Volume 1 Task 11.7, starting on page 317 in the PG. > > > > *From:* Bryan Bartik [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Saturday, July 04, 2009 11:03 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] workbook 1 lab 9 - cat addressing > > > > Eric, what volume is this? What page of the PG are you looking at? > > Thanks, > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Eric Stanfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Apologies if I am again missing something written in the guide, but I can't > seem to find any indication of what interfaces should be built on the 4 > switches in order to peer them together in as10101. When I load the > configs > into the proctorlabs rack, cat1 has a svi in 150.100.81.0/24 with which it > can later peer with R8 and then a handful of routed interfaces which appear > to be one side of routed links to the other three cats. Cat2 has no l3 > interfaces until the 200.x.x.x loopbacks are created. Cat3 and Cat4 have > no > l3 interfaces at all. > > The PG shows Cat2/3/4 being configured with network commands referencing > the > subnets shown in the bottom right of diagram 1. Is this some unspoken task > of having to finalize the routed link configs on Cat2/3/4 or am I just > missing something obvious. > > Thanks > > > > > -- > Bryan Bartik > CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP > Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
