On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:09:29 GMT, Hamlin Li <m...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Then why would we put a constraint on the number of supported argument >> vector registers here (v8-v15 instead of v8-v23)? Could we just support all >> of them, i.e., v8-v23 to comply with the RISC-V psABI? > > There is no strong reason, just it's sufficient for current implementation. > > Maybe it's better to use them all in case in the future some other code touch > the limit unnecessarily. I'll change it to use all arg v regs. Thanks for the update. Glad to see it's now fully compliant with the new calling convention variant of RISC-V psABI. I think the code will be easier for others to understand at the same time. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21083#discussion_r1774302338
