On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:57:48 GMT, Robbin Ehn <r...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Thanks Robbin for helping explaining! >> >> minor correction: v1-v7/v24-v31 = callee saved > > Yes, sorry what I meant, updated. Then why would we put a constraint on the number of supported argument vector registers here (v8-v15 instead of v8-v23)? Could we just support all of them, i.e., v8-v23 to comply with the RISC-V psABI? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21083#discussion_r1773564555