"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > "Eluze" <elu...@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1348959173728-133838.p...@n5.nabble.com... >> it's a shame - the LSR still works with an old stable version >> (actual stable >> is 2.16.0, LSR is 2.14.2) >> >> this means >> >> - new snippets using newer functions can't be added >> - old snippets must be convert.ly-ed before you can use them in the stable >> release >> >> is there a way to improve this? >> >> Eluze > > > There is the prospect of a 2.16.1 release, so there's not much point > in upgrading the LSR before that comes out.
Huh? 2.16.1 will not have any functional additions. The release or non-release of 2.16.1 is an absolute non-issue here. What is an issue is that nobody offers 2.16 yet. <URL:http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=lilypond> <URL:http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond> I can't vouch for Fedora since they have made it TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE to figure out what versions of software they use. Going on their web page, you get just bounced from one buzzphrase page to another, and I was not going to download a whole distribution iso just to check what versions they might be offering. <URL:http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=lilypond> 2.16. Ok. Slackware does not appear to offer LilyPond at all. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
