David Kastrup wrote > "Phil Holmes" < > mail@
> > writes: > >> "Eluze" < > eluzew@ > > wrote in message >> news: > 1348959173728-133838.post@.nabble > ... >>> it's a shame - the LSR still works with an old stable version >>> (actual stable >>> is 2.16.0, LSR is 2.14.2) >>> >>> this means >>> >>> - new snippets using newer functions can't be added >>> - old snippets must be convert.ly-ed before you can use them in the >>> stable >>> release >>> >>> is there a way to improve this? >>> >>> Eluze >> >> >> There is the prospect of a 2.16.1 release, so there's not much point >> in upgrading the LSR before that comes out. here's a list of the snippets that failed to compile correctly - nearly all will have to be looked at by a Schemer. list_of_errors_and_warnings.ods <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n133977/list_of_errors_and_warnings.ods> using-non-standard-clef-positions-and-adding-customized-clef-definitions.ly compiles correctly but the output is ugly here - how did you get it nice in the LSR? indent = 25 or so? Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LSR-is-not-at-the-stable-release-level-tp133838p133977.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond