On Oct 17, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Peekay Ex wrote: > Mike > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:12 AM, m...@apollinemike.com > <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: >> On Oct 17, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Neil Puttock wrote: >> >>> On 17 Oct 2011 07:56, "Peekay Ex" <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> However, and this is for Phil: could we not simply 'deprecate' the >>>> snippet(s) like we do with any that won't work (properly) in later >>>> versions, and actually I think it was Mike that a week or so ago >>>> pointed one out to me that was deprecated as of 2.14.x, because the >>>> snippet said 'I am deprecated' in the compiled the docs. Then >>>> eventually I just went back and removed the @snippet ref. >>>> >>>> Sounds pretty standard stuff. >>> >>> The CG's pretty clear on this. If the snippets are still valid, the correct >>> approach is to move them to snippets/new, with appropriate changes for new >>> syntax. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Neil >>> >> >> Hey Neil, >> >> Thank you for the info! >> Could you let me know where this is in the CG? I have a set of pages >> bookmarked that I use as a checklist - I'll add this to it. > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/adding-and-editing-snippets >
Thanks! Would it be possible to put a link to this page somewhere between 10.9.3 and 10.9.5? Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
