Mike On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:12 AM, m...@apollinemike.com <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote: > On Oct 17, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Neil Puttock wrote: > >> On 17 Oct 2011 07:56, "Peekay Ex" <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> However, and this is for Phil: could we not simply 'deprecate' the >>> snippet(s) like we do with any that won't work (properly) in later >>> versions, and actually I think it was Mike that a week or so ago >>> pointed one out to me that was deprecated as of 2.14.x, because the >>> snippet said 'I am deprecated' in the compiled the docs. Then >>> eventually I just went back and removed the @snippet ref. >>> >>> Sounds pretty standard stuff. >> >> The CG's pretty clear on this. If the snippets are still valid, the correct >> approach is to move them to snippets/new, with appropriate changes for new >> syntax. >> >> Cheers, >> Neil >> > > Hey Neil, > > Thank you for the info! > Could you let me know where this is in the CG? I have a set of pages > bookmarked that I use as a checklist - I'll add this to it.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/adding-and-editing-snippets -- -- James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
