On Oct 17, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 17 Oct 2011 07:56, "Peekay Ex" <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> However, and this is for Phil: could we not simply 'deprecate' the >> snippet(s) like we do with any that won't work (properly) in later >> versions, and actually I think it was Mike that a week or so ago >> pointed one out to me that was deprecated as of 2.14.x, because the >> snippet said 'I am deprecated' in the compiled the docs. Then >> eventually I just went back and removed the @snippet ref. >> >> Sounds pretty standard stuff. > > The CG's pretty clear on this. If the snippets are still valid, the correct > approach is to move them to snippets/new, with appropriate changes for new > syntax. > > Cheers, > Neil >
Hey Neil, Thank you for the info! Could you let me know where this is in the CG? I have a set of pages bookmarked that I use as a checklist - I'll add this to it. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
