Follow-up Comment #23, bug #66675 (group groff): The pushed version differs slightly from the comment #14 version: in comment #14, the second parameter of valid_unicode_code_sequence() was changed from "errbuf" to a null pointer. Is this difference intentional? In fact, by making it a null pointer, "errbuf" seems otherwise unused in the block in which it's declared, so if it's removed from the valid_unicode_code_sequence() call, the declaration can also go.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66675>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
