[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > "documentation". The scripts generating all the stuff are in the > > 'prmgt/' directory in the libgnupdf sources distribution. > > I have taken a closer look at your prmgt/ directory, and I really like > your efforts. I want to use this in my projects, and the simplest for > me would be to move some of your scripts into gnulib. What are your > thoughts on that? > > I think it is a really good idea. If the scripts are distributed in > gnulib more GNU packages will be using them and improving them.
Thanks for feedback, I have pushed the module into gnulib. Btw, I have blogged about this: http://blog.josefsson.org/2008/10/07/cyclomatic-code-complexity/ > My next step is to propose a gnulib module for code coverage testing > (lcov output) as well, or at least look into if that is a feasible > approach. > > Maybe maint.mk would be a good place where to put the 'make coverage' > target. Hm, yes, possibly. There is a problem about where to place the output in though. In libidn I chose to use a doc/prmgt/ sub-directory and to distribute the generated HTML file with every distribution. Then the path for the filename is always well-known, and it always built. /Simon
