bug-binutils  

Messages by Thread

• • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary amodra at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary amodra at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary amodra at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary amodra at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32067] ld crash in _bfd_elf_link_keep_memory when building statifier-1.7.4 with -Wl,--oformat,binary sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug binutils/24039] integer overflow in libiberty, heap overflow will be triggered sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system) sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug libctf/28545] cross compile incorrectly using host libraries in install relink sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug libctf/27305] relinking libctf during install does not find libbfd sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug libctf/27360] libctf.so.0: undefined symbol: bsearch_r sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug libctf/27360] libctf.so.0: undefined symbol: bsearch_r sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug ld/22269] Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug binutils/30507] NULL pointer passed to memcpy in rust-demangle reachable via nm-new sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug binutils/32049] New: objdump --disassemble=functionName --reloc includes relocations from previous function streetster at gmail dot com
• [Bug ld/31544] Incorrect default subsystem version for POSIX PE binaries pali at kernel dot org
• [Bug ld/28824] relro security issues sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/28824] relro security issues sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/28824] relro security issues hjl.tools at gmail dot com
• [Bug binutils/32048] New: SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size codyawetzel at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size codyawetzel at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size codyawetzel at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size c.luck at datact dot ch
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size c.luck at datact dot ch
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size c.luck at datact dot ch
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size c.luck at datact dot ch
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size c.luck at datact dot ch
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size patrickdepinguin at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size c.luck at datact dot ch
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size rearnsha at sourceware dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32048] SEGFAULT on arm32 with abnormal page size c.luck at datact dot ch
• Issue 70727 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump: ASSERT: (data) <= (end) sheriffbot via monorail
• [Bug libctf/32044] New: [libctf, build] ctf-spec.texi:809: warning: @xref should not appear on @multitable line vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug libctf/32044] [libctf, build] ctf-spec.texi:809: warning: @xref should not appear on @multitable line vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug libctf/32044] [libctf, build] ctf-spec.texi:809: warning: @xref should not appear on @multitable line cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug libctf/32044] [libctf, build] ctf-spec.texi:809: warning: @xref should not appear on @multitable line vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug libctf/32044] [libctf, build] ctf-spec.texi:809: warning: @xref should not appear on @multitable line vries at gcc dot gnu.org
• [Bug gold/32041] New: gold --start-lib/--end-lib error with lto. koule2333 at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gold/32041] gold --start-lib/--end-lib error with lto. koule2333 at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gold/32041] gold --start-lib/--end-lib error with lto. koule2333 at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gold/32041] gold --start-lib/--end-lib error with lto. koule2333 at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gold/32041] gold --start-lib/--end-lib error with lto. koule2333 at gmail dot com
• [Bug gas/32036] New: RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1' patrick at rivosinc dot com
  • [Bug gas/32036] RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1' nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
  • [Bug gas/32036] RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1' patrick at rivosinc dot com
  • [Bug gas/32036] RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1' patrick at rivosinc dot com
  • [Bug gas/32036] RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1' cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug gas/32036] RISC-V zcmp: unrecognized opcode `cm.mva01s s0,s1' nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
• [Bug gas/32037] New: RISC-V xventanacondops: Unrecognized opcode `vt.maskcn a0, a1, a0` patrick at rivosinc dot com
  • [Bug gas/32037] RISC-V xventanacondops: Unrecognized opcode `vt.maskcn a0, a1, a0` patrick at rivosinc dot com
  • [Bug gas/32037] RISC-V xventanacondops: Unrecognized opcode `vt.maskcn a0, a1, a0` patrick at rivosinc dot com
• [Bug binutils/32035] New: heap overlfow in readelf (binutils/dwarf.c:3648) jaehoon.jang at kaist dot ac.kr
  • [Bug binutils/32035] heap overlfow in readelf (binutils/dwarf.c:3648) nickc at redhat dot com
• Issue 68710 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Unexpected-exit in xexit sheriffbot via monorail
  • Issue 68710 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Unexpected-exit in xexit sheriffbot via monorail
• [Bug gold/26219] support DWARF5 split dwarf in dwp hjl.tools at gmail dot com
• [Bug binutils/32032] New: dwp segfaults on hello world binary top.gate9722 at fastmail dot com
  • [Bug gold/32032] dwp segfaults on hello world binary hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gold/32032] dwp segfaults on hello world binary cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
• [Bug binutils/32030] New: Algorithmic complexity vulnerability (CWE-407) in BFD nhweideman at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32030] Algorithmic complexity vulnerability (CWE-407) in BFD siddhesh at sourceware dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32030] Algorithmic complexity vulnerability (CWE-407) in BFD nhweideman at gmail dot com
• [Bug binutils/23817] strip and ld -r corrupt SHT_LLVM_ADDRSIG section (files built with clang-7) sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug ld/20828] GC-ed DSO symbols make corresponding symbols defined by a linker script local sam at gentoo dot org
• Issue 70528 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disas_ext-bfd_arch_arm: ASSERT: 0 sheriffbot via monorail
• [Bug gas/32022] New: Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions lili.cui at intel dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions jbeulich at suse dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions jbeulich at suse dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions jbeulich at suse dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions lili.cui at intel dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
• [Bug gas/28595] glibc-2.34 build fails with linker error (TLS transition from R_386_TLS_GOTIE to R_386_TLS_LE_32 against `__libc_tsd_CTYPE_B' at 0xf4 in section `.text' failed) sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gas/28595] glibc-2.34 build fails with linker error (TLS transition from R_386_TLS_GOTIE to R_386_TLS_LE_32 against `__libc_tsd_CTYPE_B' at 0xf4 in section `.text' failed) hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gas/28595] glibc-2.34 build fails with linker error (TLS transition from R_386_TLS_GOTIE to R_386_TLS_LE_32 against `__libc_tsd_CTYPE_B' at 0xf4 in section `.text' failed) cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug gas/28595] glibc-2.34 build fails with linker error (TLS transition from R_386_TLS_GOTIE to R_386_TLS_LE_32 against `__libc_tsd_CTYPE_B' at 0xf4 in section `.text' failed) cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug gas/28595] glibc-2.34 build fails with linker error (TLS transition from R_386_TLS_GOTIE to R_386_TLS_LE_32 against `__libc_tsd_CTYPE_B' at 0xf4 in section `.text' failed) cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
• [Bug binutils/32018] New: Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 bigmagicreadsun at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 bigmagicreadsun at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 bigmagicreadsun at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 bigmagicreadsun at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 bigmagicreadsun at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 bigmagicreadsun at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 nickc at redhat dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 bigmagicreadsun at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug gprofng/32018] Compilation of binutils 2.43 for riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu failed on CentOS 6 vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
• [Bug ld/32017] New: Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug gold/32016] New: ld.gold error unsupported -mbss-plt code judge.packham+glibc at gmail dot com
  • [Bug gold/32016] ld.gold error unsupported -mbss-plt code judge.packham+glibc at gmail dot com
• [Bug ld/32014] New: RISC-V: -flto causes .riscv.attributes section to ignore specified extensions patrick at rivosinc dot com
  • [Bug ld/32014] RISC-V: -flto causes .riscv.attributes section to ignore specified extensions patrick at rivosinc dot com
  • [Bug ld/32014] RISC-V: -flto causes .riscv.attributes section to ignore specified extensions cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug ld/32014] RISC-V: -flto causes .riscv.attributes section to ignore specified extensions nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
• [Bug ld/30697] ppc32 mix of local-dynamic and global-dynamic TLS sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug binutils/32006] New: ld pulls symbols from wrong library felix-glibc at fefe dot de
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library amodra at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library felix-glibc at fefe dot de
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library c...@reto-schneider.ch
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library jahns at dkrz dot de
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library felix-glibc at fefe dot de
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library jahns at dkrz dot de
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library jahns at dkrz dot de
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library stefan at franke dot ms
  • [Bug binutils/32006] ld pulls symbols from wrong library felics-sourceware at kettenbruch dot de
• [Bug ld/32003] New: Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile jbeulich at suse dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bluca at debian dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile jbeulich at suse dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile jbeulich at suse dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile sam at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile dilfridge at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bluca at debian dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile doko at debian dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bluca at debian dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bluca at debian dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bluca at debian dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile dilfridge at gentoo dot org
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile bdrung at posteo dot de
  • [Bug ld/32003] Specifying --package-metadata might not be possible and is too fragile cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
• [Bug binutils/32002] New: Untranslated plural in readelf.c:9433 fmarchal at perso dot be
  • [Bug binutils/32002] Untranslated plural in readelf.c:9433 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  • [Bug binutils/32002] Untranslated plural in readelf.c:9433 nickc at redhat dot com
• [Bug ld/31179] RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects sam at gentoo dot org
• [Bug binutils/32001] New: Untranslated part in error message of elfxx-riscv.c:2466 fmarchal at perso dot be
  • [Bug binutils/32001] Untranslated part in error message of elfxx-riscv.c:2466 nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
  • [Bug binutils/32001] Untranslated part in error message of elfxx-riscv.c:2466 fmarchal at perso dot be
  • [Bug binutils/32001] Untranslated part in error message of elfxx-riscv.c:2466 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

• Earlier messages
• Later messages