https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32254
--- Comment #2 from rdiez-2006 at rd10 dot de --- Thanks for your feedback. I'll see if I can find some time to test it over the weekend. In the mean time, maybe you can help me understand the following better: > Since the last-modified timestamp on the .info files matches > that on the .texi files, the build system thinks that it > needs to regenerate all of the documentation, > including the doc/asconfig.texi file. Normally, if the timestamps match, GNU make will not rebuild anything. If I 'touch' all *.info files, that would actually trigger regeneration. Or did I miss something? Why is the binutils source shipping a pre-built doc/asconfig.texi anyway? Shouldn't the user always build it from source as par of the compilation? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
