https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32297
--- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat at oracle dot com> ---
A hand-crafted reproducer:
$ cat bar.c
void foo();
unsigned long var;
void test () {
var = (unsigned long)foo;
foo ();
}
$ cat foo.s
.globl foo
foo:
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
$ gcc -O2 -Wa,--gsframe -fPIC -c -o bar.o bar.c
$ gcc -O2 -Wa,--gsframe -fPIC -S bar.c
$ ld -shared -z ibtplt -o pltsec.so foo.o bar.o
ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.43.50.20241016 assertion fail
/scratch/ibhagat/BINUTILS-GDB/binutils-gdb/binutils-gdb/bfd/elfxx-x86.c:1990
make: *** [Makefile:23: pltsec.so] Error 1
The above is on trunk, hence a different line number.
The issue seems to be that the implementation in ld has incorrect conditionals
for checking the presence of a .plt.sec, when writing out SFrame for it. As in
the reproducer above, in absence of a .plt.sec, bfd triggers an assertion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
