https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32260
--- Comment #9 from Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de> --- So, I have two patches for you, see above. It would be nice to know that they work independendly, so if you could first test the first patch in isolation, so that we can know that the error handling now works. (What should happen with just the first patch is that the very-large input section is still overestimated but then simply left alone and not deduplicated, but pasted into the output as is). And then add the second patch that throttles the over-estimation a bit, and perhaps makes it so that your large input section is then deduplicated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
