bug-autoconf  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72] testsuite: 19 failed Paul Eggert
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72] testsuite: 19 failed Sean Denney
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72] testsuite: 19 failed Sean Denney
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72] testsuite: 19 failed Paul Eggert
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72] testsuite: 19 failed Sean Denney
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72] testsuite: 19 failed Paul Eggert
• [GNU Autoconf 2.72] testsuite: 420 421 606 607 failed Bruno Haible
• [sr #110990] AS_IF / AC_CHECK_LIB generates invalid shell on editline-1.17.1 Sergei Trofimovich
  • [sr #110990] AS_IF / AC_CHECK_LIB generates invalid shell on editline-1.17.1 anonymous
  • [sr #110990] AS_IF / AC_CHECK_LIB generates invalid shell on editline-1.17.1 Sergei Trofimovich
  • [sr #110990] AS_IF / AC_CHECK_LIB generates invalid shell on editline-1.17.1 Sergei Trofimovich
• autoconf-2.72 released [stable] Zack Weinberg
• [sr #110989] Improve reliability of AT_MTIME_DELAY in test suite with a loop Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110989] Improve reliability of AT_MTIME_DELAY in test suite with a loop Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110989] Improve reliability of AT_MTIME_DELAY in test suite with a loop Karl Berry
  • [sr #110989] Improve reliability of AT_MTIME_DELAY in test suite with a loop Zack Weinberg
• [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 41 failed on OS X 10.6 Sevan Janiyan
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 41 failed on OS X 10.6 Sevan Janiyan
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 41 failed on OS X 10.6 Sevan Janiyan
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 41 failed on OS X 10.6 Sevan Janiyan
• [sr #110987] AC_PROG_CC_C_O + AC_LANG([C++]) combines C-specific compiler options with C++ source Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110987] AC_PROG_CC_C_O + AC_LANG([C++]) combines C-specific compiler options with C++ source Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110987] AC_PROG_CC_C_O + AC_LANG([C++]) combines C-specific compiler options with C++ source Zack Weinberg
• m4_foreach_w(...AC_DEFINE...) expansion change in 2.72e? Karl Berry
  • Re: m4_foreach_w(...AC_DEFINE...) expansion change in 2.72e? Zack Weinberg
  • Re: m4_foreach_w(...AC_DEFINE...) expansion change in 2.72e? Zack Weinberg
  • Re: m4_foreach_w(...AC_DEFINE...) expansion change in 2.72e? Paul Eggert
  • Re: m4_foreach_w(...AC_DEFINE...) expansion change in 2.72e? Zack Weinberg
  • Re: m4_foreach_w(...AC_DEFINE...) expansion change in 2.72e? Karl Berry
• [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 332 failed on OS X 10.9 Sevan Janiyan
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 332 failed on OS X 10.9 Sevan Janiyan
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 332 failed on OS X 10.9 Zack Weinberg
• GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 failed on OS X 10.8 Sevan Janiyan
• [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 failed on OS X 10.7 Sevan Janiyan
• [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 40 41 45 280 281 282 286 287 failed on OS X 10.4 Sevan Janiyan
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 40 41 45 280 281 282 286 287 failed on OS X 10.4 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 40 41 45 280 281 282 286 287 failed on OS X 10.4 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 40 41 45 280 281 282 286 287 failed on OS X 10.4 Sevan Janiyan
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 40 41 45 280 281 282 286 287 failed on OS X 10.4 Sevan Janiyan
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 40 41 45 280 281 282 286 287 failed on OS X 10.4 Sevan Janiyan
• [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 failed on OS X 10.10 Sevan Janiyan
• [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Nick Bowler
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Paul Eggert
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Nick Bowler
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Paul Eggert
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Nick Bowler
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Paul Eggert
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.72e] testsuite: 11 119 261 failed on Solaris 11.4 x86 Paul Eggert
• autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate] Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72e released [release candidate] Frederic Berat
• [sr #110986] "autoconf: forbidden tokens, basic" testsuite failure on some systems Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110986] "autoconf: forbidden tokens, basic" testsuite failure on some systems Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110986] "autoconf: forbidden tokens, basic" testsuite failure on some systems Zack Weinberg
• [sr #110985] "Substitute and define special characters" test fails on NetBSD 9 Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110985] "Substitute and define special characters" test fails on NetBSD 9 Zack Weinberg
• [sr #110983] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE doesn't honor AC_LANG setting Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110983] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE doesn't honor AC_LANG setting Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110983] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE doesn't honor AC_LANG setting Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110983] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE doesn't honor AC_LANG setting Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110983] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE doesn't honor AC_LANG setting Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110983] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE doesn't honor AC_LANG setting anonymous
  • [sr #110983] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE doesn't honor AC_LANG setting Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110983] AC_SYS_LARGEFILE doesn't honor AC_LANG setting anonymous
• [sr #110982] Autotest: add some way to declare an expected failure halfway through the test Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110982] Autotest: add some way to declare an expected failure halfway through the test Zack Weinberg
• Bug triage for 2.72 complete; release freeze begins now Zack Weinberg
• Bug triage for 2.72 release commencing Zack Weinberg
• [GNU Autoconf 2.72d] testsuite: 11 41 275 failed Bjarni Ingi Gislason
• [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Valery Ushakov
  • [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Valery Ushakov
  • [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110971] busybox mkdir is misdetected Zack Weinberg
• Re: autoconf-2.72d released [beta] Richard Purdie
  • Re: [platform-testers] autoconf-2.72d released [beta] Frederic Berat
• Re: autoconf-2.72d on other platforms Bruno Haible
  • Re: autoconf-2.72d on other platforms Zack Weinberg
• Re: autoconf-2.72d on Cygwin Bruno Haible
  • Re: autoconf-2.72d on Cygwin Zack Weinberg
• Re: autoconf-2.72d on Solaris 11 OpenIndiana: testsuite: 260 445 446 510 failed Bruno Haible
  • Re: autoconf-2.72d on Solaris 11 OpenIndiana: testsuite: 260 445 446 510 failed Zack Weinberg
  • Re: autoconf-2.72d on Solaris 11 OpenIndiana: testsuite: 260 445 446 510 failed Zack Weinberg
• autoconf-2.72d on CentOS 8: testsuite: 11 failed Bruno Haible
  • Re: autoconf-2.72d on CentOS 8: testsuite: 11 failed Zack Weinberg
  • Re: autoconf-2.72d on CentOS 8: testsuite: 11 failed Bruno Haible
  • Re: autoconf-2.72d on CentOS 8: testsuite: 11 failed Paul Eggert
  • Re: autoconf-2.72d on CentOS 8: testsuite: 11 failed Zack Weinberg
• Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.71] testsuite: 254 255 ... catastrophic failure Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.71] testsuite: 254 255 ... catastrophic failure Nick Bowler
  • Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.71] testsuite: 254 255 ... catastrophic failure Zack Weinberg
• [sr #110961] 3 Vulnerabilities Result in Code Execution upon running `autoconf` with crafted `configure.ac` file anonymous
  • Fwd: [sr #110961] 3 Vulnerabilities Result in Code Execution upon running `autoconf` with crafted `configure.ac` file Ally Petitt
  • [sr #110961] 3 Vulnerabilities Result in Code Execution upon running `autoconf` with crafted `configure.ac` file Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110961] 3 Vulnerabilities Result in Code Execution upon running `autoconf` with crafted `configure.ac` file Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110961] Arbitrary Code Execution upon running `autoconf` with crafted `configure.ac` file Zack Weinberg
• m4_ax_check_typedef.m4 fixes stsp
  • Re: m4_ax_check_typedef.m4 fixes Nick Bowler
• Re: [GNU Autoconf 2.69] Zack Weinberg
• AC_PROVIDE_IFELSE, AC_FATAL, AC_DEFUN_ONCE not documented Karl Berry
• [sr #110927] 30 tests fail building on macOS Venture 13.5.1 with Xcode 14.3.1 anonymous
  • [sr #110927] 30 tests fail building on macOS Venture 13.5.1 with Xcode 14.3.1 Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110927] 30 tests fail building on macOS Venture 13.5.1 with Xcode 14.3.1 Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110927] 30 tests fail building on macOS Venture 13.5.1 with Xcode 14.3.1 Zack Weinberg
• Re: [PATCH] Quote 'like this', not `like this'. Paul Eggert
• AC_PROVIDE{_IFELSE} not documented? Karl Berry
  • Re: AC_PROVIDE{_IFELSE} not documented? Nick Bowler
• [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Maxim Cournoyer
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Maxim Cournoyer
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Maxim Cournoyer
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Maxim Cournoyer
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Maxim Cournoyer
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110886] autoupdate produces broken configure.ac Zack Weinberg
• AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Sam James
  • [PATCH] Include unistd.h for getpagesize in AC_FUNC_MMAP Matt Turner
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Matt Turner
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Matt Turner
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Zack Weinberg
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Florian Weimer
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Paul Eggert
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Florian Weimer
  • Re: AC_FUNC_MMAP lacks <unistd.h> include? Paul Eggert
• [sr #110879] revert forcing/setting -std=gnu++11 by default (introduced in Autoconf 2.70) Jörn Heusipp
  • [sr #110879] revert forcing/setting -std=gnu++11 by default (introduced in Autoconf 2.70) Jörn Heusipp
  • [sr #110879] revert forcing/setting -std=gnu++11 by default (introduced in Autoconf 2.70) Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110879] revert forcing/setting -std=gnu++11 by default (introduced in Autoconf 2.70) Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110879] revert forcing/setting -std=gnu++11 by default (introduced in Autoconf 2.70) Jörn Heusipp
  • [sr #110879] revert forcing/setting -std=gnu++11 by default (introduced in Autoconf 2.70) Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110879] revert forcing/setting -std=gnu++11 by default (introduced in Autoconf 2.70) Jörn Heusipp
• [sr #110872] m4_warn differs in various ways from its documentation anonymous
  • [sr #110872] m4_warn differs in various ways from its documentation Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110872] m4_warn differs in various ways from its documentation Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110872] m4_warn differs in various ways from its documentation Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110872] m4_warn differs in various ways from its documentation Zack Weinberg
• [sr #110852] autoconf 2.71 checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object anonymous
  • [sr #110852] autoconf 2.71 checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object anonymous
  • [sr #110852] autoconf 2.71 checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object Zack Weinberg
• [sr #110846] cross-compilation is not entered when build_alias and host_alias are the same anonymous
  • Re: [sr #110846] cross-compilation is not entered when build_alias and host_alias are the same Nick Bowler
  • Re: [sr #110846] cross-compilation is not entered when build_alias and host_alias are the same Lang Daniel
  • [sr #110846] cross-compilation is not entered when build_alias and host_alias are the same Zack Weinberg
  • Re: [sr #110846] cross-compilation is not entered when build_alias and host_alias are the same Nick Bowler
  • [sr #110846] cross-compilation is not entered when build_alias and host_alias are the same Zack Weinberg
• two recent NEWS entries Bruno Haible
  • Re: two recent NEWS entries Paul Eggert
  • Re: two recent NEWS entries Bruno Haible
• Bug in AX_LIB_HDF5 Harald Anlauf
• [sr #110828] configure: error: could not determine the string function for int64_t anonymous
  • [sr #110828] configure: error: could not determine the string function for int64_t Sam James
  • [sr #110828] configure: error: could not determine the string function for int64_t Paul Eggert
• CFLAGS containing quoted arguments to compiler does not work (GalaxyMaster)
  • Re: CFLAGS containing quoted arguments to compiler does not work Paul Eggert
• bug#59406: [Update install instruction for macOS] Update install instruction for macOS Karl Berry
• Missing <stdlib.h> include in lib/autoconf/c.m4 Sam James
  • Re: Missing <stdlib.h> include in lib/autoconf/c.m4 Sam James
  • Re: Missing <stdlib.h> include in lib/autoconf/c.m4 Sam James
  • Re: Missing <stdlib.h> include in lib/autoconf/c.m4 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Missing <stdlib.h> include in lib/autoconf/c.m4 Sam James
• [sr #110746] GNU Autoconf 2.71: F77 name-mangling fails when compiling with mpicxx anonymous
  • [sr #110746] GNU Autoconf 2.71: F77 name-mangling fails when compiling with mpicxx Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110746] GNU Autoconf 2.71: F77 name-mangling fails when compiling with mpicxx Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110746] GNU Autoconf 2.71: F77 name-mangling fails when compiling with mpicxx anonymous
  • [sr #110746] GNU Autoconf 2.71: F77 name-mangling fails when compiling with mpicxx Zack Weinberg
• [sr #110739] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Thomas Klausner
  • [sr #110739] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Zack Weinberg
• [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Thomas Klausner
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Zack Weinberg
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Thomas Klausner
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Thomas Klausner
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Greg Troxel
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Paul Eggert
  • [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Thomas Klausner
  • Re: [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Tom Lane
  • Re: [sr #110740] AC_PROG_MKDIR_P has incorrect result on NetBSD Paul Eggert
• Re: GNU Autoconf 2.71 massive test failures with bash-5.2 Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GNU Autoconf 2.71 massive test failures with bash-5.2 Bruce Dubbs

• Earlier messages
• Later messages