Re: fedora 42 doesn't have awk: how to deal with autoconf subst?

[pluto--- via Bug reports for autoconf]

James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> wrote:

> should the scripts also check for 'busybox awk' in $PATH?

Do they check for other commands that way?

It should not be necessary, unless we want to allow for a
busybox that is installed strangely.