On Sat, Apr 19, 2025, at 8:39 AM, James Cloos wrote: >>>>>> "PH" == Perry Hutchison <pl...@agora.rdrop.com> writes: > > PH> James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> wrote: >>> should the scripts also check for 'busybox awk' in $PATH? > > PH> Do they check for other commands that way? > > PH> It should not be necessary, unless we want to allow for a > PH> busybox that is installed strangely. > > it is not strange to install busybox w/ just a single link in bin, ie > w/o sym- or hard-links for each of the commands.
this _only_ works because busybox's implementation of the shell language knows all the commands that are implemented by busybox. if you want to use busybox together with a different shell then you do have to create all the symlinks. zw
