Well, with the latest consensus report on
anthropogenic global warming, will the poo-pooers
finally be convinced?  I doubt it.  I was alarmed
enough, especially WRT 'a third of all animal species
at risk of extinction' within the next century, that I
walked around my apt., trying to see what else I could
do about my energy consumption.  I don't want to drop
my thermostat lower than the already-set 60oF
(bedrooms are colder) because of the risk of freezing
pipes (the apt. is above a barn, with all sides
exposed to the wind), but did find a forgotten bedroom
TV plugged in.  Now I unplug my VCR and TV at night
etc., plan to get a wind-up alarm clock to replace the
electric one I currently use, and will replace closet
lights with fluorescents (re: earlier discussion on
feeling 'odd' under them, I do also, although not to
the extent of nausea or full-blown headache). 
Fortunately for me, I get great natural light inside
during the day.

This is the NPR site/story, with links to full-text
documents should you wish to see them:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9398924
April 6, 2007 · A United Nations panel of scientists
reports it is highly confident that humans are warming
the Earth's climate...The new study, released Friday,
predicts widespread droughts in some places, but
flooding in others. Some regions, such as North
America, are likely to suffer less from a warming
climate. Low-lying areas will experience more flooding
from rising oceans or stronger storms, however. There
will also be increases in the range of insect pests
and diseases now more common in tropical areas. Dry
regions in the southern part of the country may also
get drier. Some regions however may enjoy benefits,
such as longer growing seasons for agriculture...

The summary:
http://www.ipcc.ch/

Here's a story on the recent Supreme Court's ruling
about the EPA and carbon emissions:

http://environment.about.com/od/environmentallawpolicy/a/epa_greenhouse.htm
April 2, 2007 – In what may prove to be an historic
turning point in the fight to reduce global warming,
the U.S. Supreme Court today handed down a decision in
a landmark environmental case—the first ever involving
global warming—that is being hailed as a victory for
the environment and a setback for the Bush
administration. 
In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that carbon dioxide
is a pollutant under the Clean Air Act and that the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has the authority
to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles
and other vehicles...

A few more recent legal wins for the environment:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9307833
...Last week, one federal Court rejected Bush
administration changes to the rules that govern what
kind of logging, mining or other activities can be
allowed in national forests. Another court blocked a
Bush administration policy to permit coal mining
companies to remove the top of mountains in Appalachia
and deposit leftover rock in valley streams. On
Monday, the Supreme Court rejected two Bush
administration policies — one on global warming and
another on coal-fired power plants...
...In one of Monday's rulings, the Supreme Court said
old coal fire power plants must install new pollution
controls if they make big repairs and increase the
pollution they pump out each year. It rejected Duke
Energy's argument that it doesn't have to install new
equipment, unless it also increases the amount of
pollution it pumps out each hour... 

Debbi
This is not a false alarm
This is not a test
Nowhere we can fly away
Nowhere we can rest...
Rush, album Presto, forgot song title (maybe Red
Tide?)



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to