"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> -------Original Message-------
> From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As the leaders of the "contain the US alliance?" The only democracy that I know of
> that favors attacking Iraq without a new specific Security Council resolution
> authorizing it explicitly is the US. After we go in, probably
> without GB, this will be a significant force. Rightly or wrongly, many/most people
> will consider an unconstrained US as the biggest risk to themselves.
> ********************************
>
> I don't think that France is going to find too many people in the "contain US
> alliance."
>
> According to recent reports, there are currently 47 nations in the
> "coalition of the willing", who are providing material support.
> Unfortunately, I have not seen a listing of these nations anywhere (and
> I've looked), but it seems that the number may be inflated slightly.
I have a list of less than 47 countries, posted on another list I'm on, but
I can't vouch for its accuracy. It actually has 191 UN member nations
listed in groups broken down by the amount of support they're lending. If
you think it would help, I can post that.
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
