-------Original Message-------
From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As the leaders of the "contain the US alliance?"  The only democracy that I know of 
that favors attacking Iraq without a new specific Security Council resolution 
authorizing it explicitly is the US.  After we go in, probably
without GB, this will be a significant force.  Rightly or wrongly, many/most people 
will consider an unconstrained US as the biggest risk to themselves.
********************************

I don't think that France is going to find too many people in the "contain US 
alliance."  

According to recent reports, there are currently 47 nations in the "coalition of the 
willing", who are providing material support.   Unfortunately, I have not seen a 
listing of these nations anywhere (and I've looked), but it seems that the number may 
be inflated slightly.  

Secondly, I think that there is no nation whose official policy is *do not get a 
second UN Resolution, even if we could.*   Thus, the appropriate numbers to consider 
are "democracies in the current group of 47 that would bail on on the coalition 
without a second UN resolution."   I personally think that the UK will participate 
even without a second reso, and Blair will hope for vindication from a short, swift, 
and successful war.   I have no doubt that Australia, Spain, the Czech Rep., Japan, 
Italy, Bulgaria, and Romania (these last two only tokenly materially, but very 
vigorously diplomatically) will participate without a UN Resolution - and it seems 
likely that Canada will as well, as I have heard no reports of Canada preparing to 
withdraw its troops from the Gulf.  Meanwhile, I have not been able to find firm 
reports of the material contributions being provided by other nations, but I have seen 
no indication Denmark, Norway, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Lithuania, Latvia, 
and Estonia changing their current pro-war positions without another UN Resolution.  I 
believe that the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Iceland are also pro-war, as they 
supported the defence of Turkey in NATO, but I haven't found official confirmation of 
that.  Austria and Ireland are officially neutral, but from all reports that I have 
seen, they are quietly supporting the US war. 

Additionally, several non-democracies are clearly supporting us.  Uzbekistan somehow 
seems to always be in our camp, for reasons I have never fully discerned.   A token 
Arab contingent has also been assembled to participate in the fighting, including 
troops from Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, the UAE, Oman, and just this week 1,000 troops 
from Saudi Arabia.  These guys aren't going home without a second UN resolution.

JDG - International Opion :), Maru.
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to