bitcoin-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [bitcoin-dev] New Silent Payment version woltx via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] New Silent Payment version woltx via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] New Silent Payment version Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] A method for BIP322 signing delegation Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A method for BIP322 signing delegation Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A method for BIP322 signing delegation Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] A method for BIP322 signing delegation Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Regarding BIP322 edge cases Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding BIP322 edge cases vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding BIP322 edge cases Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding BIP322 edge cases Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding BIP322 edge cases Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding BIP322 edge cases vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding BIP322 edge cases Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] P2P trading replacement transactions alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] P2P trading replacement transactions Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] P2P trading replacement transactions alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] P2P trading replacement transactions Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] P2P trading replacement transactions alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage (appendix) Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage Peter (Coinkite Inc) via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP-notatether-signedmessage Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] RBF rules, setting policy defaults in Bitcoin Core and the role of BIPs Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RBF rules, setting policy defaults in Bitcoin Core and the role of BIPs Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RBF rules, setting policy defaults in Bitcoin Core and the role of BIPs Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] RBF rules, setting policy defaults in Bitcoin Core and the role of BIPs Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Private Payments Alfred Hodler via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Private Payments Ruben Somsen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Private Payments Alfred Hodler via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Zero-knowledge proofs e.g. Schnorr are incompatible with address signing without compromise Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Zero-knowledge proofs e.g. Schnorr are incompatible with address signing without compromise Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Zero-knowledge proofs e.g. Schnorr are incompatible with address signing without compromise Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Zero-knowledge proofs e.g. Schnorr are incompatible with address signing without compromise Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Dmitry Petukhov via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Dmitry Petukhov via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Receiving and Change Derivation Paths in a Single Descriptor Craig Raw via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Discussion about message verification draft BIP Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Aaradhya Chauhan via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Aaradhya Chauhan via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Aaradhya Chauhan via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee aliashraf.btc At protonmail via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Aaradhya Chauhan via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Aaradhya Chauhan via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Online Socratic on MuSig2 and biweekly secp256k1 IRC meeting Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] bitcoind -proxy=host:port doesn't work for unroutable network Anton Shevchenko via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoind -proxy=host:port doesn't work for unroutable network Anton Shevchenko via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants aliashraf.btc At protonmail via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants aliashraf.btc At protonmail via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Buck O Perley via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Devrandom via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants Devrandom via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Trying all address types in message signing verification (BIP) Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trying all address types in message signing verification (BIP) Peter (Coinkite Inc) via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trying all address types in message signing verification (BIP) Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trying all address types in message signing verification (BIP) Craig Raw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trying all address types in message signing verification (BIP) Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trying all address types in message signing verification (BIP) Ali Sherief via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Trying all address types in message signing verification (BIP) Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] How to do Proof of Micro-Burn? Велеслав via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] How to do Proof of Micro-Burn? Ruben Somsen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] How to do Proof of Micro-Burn? ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] How to do Proof of Micro-Burn? Ruben Somsen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] How to do Proof of Micro-Burn? ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] How to do Proof of Micro-Burn? Ruben Somsen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] How to do Proof of Micro-Burn? Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Full Disclosure: Denial of Service in STONEWALLx2 (p2p coinjoin) alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Full Disclosure: Denial of Service in STONEWALLx2 (p2p coinjoin) alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security John Tromp via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security John Tromp via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Gino Pinuto via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Manuel Costa via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Gino Pinuto via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Manuel Costa via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
• Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Peter via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Peter via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Felipe Micaroni Lalli via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Pox via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Security problems with relying on transaction fees for security Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
• [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary naman naman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary naman naman via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Tobin Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Larry Ruane via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Jacob Eliosoff via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Stefan Richter via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Giuseppe B via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Zac Greenwood via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Alfred Hodler via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary John Tromp via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary John Tromp via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Peter via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary aliashraf.btc At protonmail via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Jaroslaw via bitcoin-dev
  • Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev

• Earlier messages
• Later messages