Hi Aaradhya,
> As it's not a consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just needing
> support from full node operators
A few miners will need to use a lower minrelaytxfee for this to work. I don't
think miners would want to lower their profits.
/dev/fd0
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, July 26th, 2022 at 1:56 PM, Aaradhya Chauhan via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
I know this might be a sort of repetition for a previous question, but I do
want to know from enthusiasts in this group that while Bitcoin was trading at
much lower price in its early days, 1 sat/vB was a good dust protection
measure. But now, I think it's a bit high for merely a dust protection measure,
and should be lowered slightly. Even if not, it should be lowered to half when
prices go double than today and keeps oscillating at that point. As it's not a
consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just needing support from full
node operators. I support LN but I think transaction affordability should
remain constant in the future. If I'm okay to wait in a queue, I should have
the option for same affordability for minimum fees in the future as it is
today. (Like we still have posts today while email still exists).
Awaiting your response.
Regards
Aaradhya Chauhan
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
