I get the point you're trying to make. I just don't think a volunteer crosswalk and a car accident is an appropriate analogy for open source software.
The whole point of open source software is that you as a user get software for free and if something goes wrong you are free to collaborate to fix it or stop using it. That's it. There is no room for anything else. Complaining about the quality of software you did not pay for or even test before putting it in production seems illogical to me especially if you are given the tools to fix it. On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 3:51 PM Marc <m...@f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > > I don't think you got the point. Can it be you are working on 9.18? ;P > > Luckily legislation is different and your kid is being protected from such > bad behaviour. If some volunteer is helping your kid cross the road and it > gets hit, he is as liable as any other person (if he fucked up) > > So doing something for free is not an excuse to be allowed to fuck up or > irresponsible. > > > > > > My kid would know better than to take free candy. And if he did he would > > know there is a risk involved for which only he would be responsible. > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 3:12 PM Marc > > > > > > > > > > That being said. It's preposterous to complain about free > > software. > > > > > > > > > > So if some store owner gives your kid candy that previously fell on > > the floor, you are not complaining because it was for .... free ????? > > > >
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
