On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:00 AM, steve <st...@lonetwin.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 01/11/2011 12:27 AM, Narendra Sisodiya wrote:
>
>> On
>>
>>
>>> In fact, afaict from your responses of coming up with imaginative
>>>
>>>> fairy-tale scenarios where your code spits out valid PyQt which your
>>>> users
>>>> then may use after downloading GPL'd PyQt (did I get that right ?) I
>>>> might
>>>> even say you are trolling.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> See, I wrote a clear fictitious example -- and I asked for
>>> help/discussion
>>> on that but people started talking in-general and teaching license
>>> classes.
>>> this irritated me.
>>>
>>>
> Well, in that case the irritation stems out of your misunderstanding of
> /why/ they were speaking of licenses. To aid your understanding of the
> implications of the license were being demonstrated by comparing different
> licenses.
>
>
> I said - I am writing my a code which is close source and I have not
>>> given
>>> any rights to user. {i am against it but I am just making an example}
>>> Now, I am not distributing PyQT to users. All I am given a close source
>>> application which won't run without PyQt.
>>>
>>
> Here in lies the problem. When you distributed your PyQt based closed
> source application, you have already distributed PyQt ! ...since at
> somepoint in your code you are calling 'import PyQt'
SuperLike... First most constructive post from last 2-3 days on bangpyper..
That's exactly is my question.
I am saying, that I have not installed any PyQT on my system and I am not
using Python atall. {to other, please assume for GOD sake}
I have purchased a book on PyQT. and now I am writing my code using text
editor and i am not using PyQT atall.
Now I just want to do any thing with my code..
GPL + public release + nonprofit
GPL + for profit
Close software + non- profit -- freeware
Close software + for profit -- proprietary software
My user are downloading PyQT and running my .py files...
> and AFAIK all tools that convert python code to an binary 'exe' format
> essentially create some sort of isolated python environment including just
> the modules required and then compress it up as a self-extracting and
> installing executable.
>
> Users are downloading PyQT.
>>
>
> This will not be used by your closed source binary because the binary will
> use a custom python (think in terms similar to virtualenv) with a custom
> PYTHONPATH.
>
>
I will learn on it, till now, I am just making and running py files. no idea
about binary part exactly.
>
> So In this process did I made any copyright infringement... I was
>>> expecting
>>> yes or no kind of answer.
>>>
>>
> The answer then is yes.
>
>
Same question with more detailed explanation.
>
> I gave a clear example.. I am unable to notice any copyright infringement
>>> in it.
>>>
>>>
> ...well there is and this is where the discussion about PyQt GPL Vs
> PySide's LGPL is relevant.
>
>
I never said about this, Infact my first question what on Which GUI lib to
be used..
So people can share what they worked on it,,,
>
>
>>> I was asking like this - how does it matter Compiler I am using , I can
>> use
>> Propitiatory License IDE too - I can license my code to any license at my
>> will. How the decision of my code's license depends on Compilers License.
>> for me libraries are also a tool. I am just using them for code building.
>> As
>> long as I am not giving a bundled close solution to user, I need not to
>> worry about commercial license to do it. But I am not bundling them.
>>
>
> You should learn how libraries work. Libraries are not just a compile time
> thing. When you 'link' against a library, the binary gets a reference to
> where to 'load' the library at runtime. This is the reason why even if you
> don't intend to do devel work, you cannot run some applications in linux
> without installing the dependent libraries (as opposed to when you do intend
> to do devel work, you install the -devel packages).
>
> (dodging the pedants: yes I know of static linking but I am trying to keep
> it simple here).
>
> So, when you distribute a close source python app., your exe will also
> include the library that your application needs to load at runtime.
>
>
> , I am
>> just giving my application to some license, how does this decision depends
>> on license of libraries. I might be wrong at some where in my fundas or
>> unable to grab the "requirement" that why should one buy commercial
>> license
>> of PyQt. So I asked this question. I think it was very much clear from
>> my
>> post . If not, one can ask to clarify what I want to know..
>> Posting/Replying on what license to use, what license gives what and one
>> can sell GPL code too etc and so many other things some guys replied. That
>> gave me strong irritation.
>>
>
> I hope my reply didn't give you strong irritation. If what I wrote made
> sense to you go back to the thread and re-read it, you'll see a natural flow
> there about the discussion based on the assumption that you know how
> libraries work.
>
>
Thanks Steve for Guiding me..
--
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ Narendra Sisodiya
│ http://narendrasisodiya.com
└─────────────────────────┘
_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
