Response 2 --- this is my actual responce without any spam.. I just wanted to show how one can just use inline posting to feed "not-needed" information.. in discussion... Pleases do not throw stone on me for posting this header in top posting.. ______________
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Gora Mohanty <g...@mimirtech.com> wrote: > Hi Narendra, > > I hate to step in here, and debated whether to do it > at all or not, as I certainly do not like to dictate to > people that they should do this, or that. However, if > you will permit me certain observations: > > I respect what you are trying to do, probably also > from a perspective that people on *this* group might > not have. However, that by no means excuses various > things: > * Difficulty in expressing yourself asides, you seem to > have an issue in understanding how licences work. > That is OK, but a refusal to accept well-meaning > follow-ups is a problem: Noufal's being a case in > point. > * I also have serious issues with "If you Google > search on my name probably you will be 25000+ > hits..." So, what? There are people on this list who > probably have ten times as many hits. Or, even if > not, an argument constructed by appeal to authority > is no argument at all in a tech. world. > I gave this figure to show, I know the rules and regulation and know mailing list culture. so need not to hit somebody on his first post. If somebody is doing it again and again, give him a lecture then,,, > * Noufal has already done a great job of explaining > the issues. To summarise his points, you have two > choices: > - You can release your code under the GPL. IMHO, > this is exactly what you should be doing. Releasing > under the GPL does *not* prohibit you from charging > for the code. > - If for whatever reason (such as wanting complete > control over future work), your customer or you wants > not to be encumbered by the GPL, you *have* to buy > a commercial licence from PyQT (be warned that I > have not read the PyQT licence, but am going by what > the discussion on this list indicates. > > Thanks to everybody for devoting valuable time, but when I started the discussion , I asked clearly that why somebody should buy commercial license and later on I gave a example to bypass this restriction. So I was expecting discussion on this and not a "lecture on how on license" form various members. I am not blaming everybody who participated in the thread.. _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
